🔗 Share this article

Ken Burns is now considered beyond being a filmmaker; his name is a franchise, a one-man industrial complex. Whenever he releases project arriving on the PBS network, everybody wants an interview.

Burns has done “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he notes, nearing the end of his extensive publicity circuit featuring numerous locations, 80 screenings plus countless media sessions. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Thankfully Burns is a force of nature, as expressive in conversation as he is prolific while filmmaking. The veteran director has traveled from prestigious venues to mainstream media outlets to promote his latest monumental work: The American Revolution, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that occupied the past decade of his life and debuted recently on PBS.

Classic Documentary Style

Comparable to methodical preparation amidst instant gratification culture, this documentary series is defiantly traditional, more redolent of traditional war documentaries rather than contemporary digital documentaries and podcast series.

But for Burns, who has built a career documenting American historical narratives including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, its origin story is not just another subject but fundamental. “I recently told collaborator Sarah Botstein during our discussions, and she shared this view: we won’t work on a more important film Burns states by phone from New York.

Massive Research Effort

Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt along with writer Geoffrey Ward utilized numerous historical volumes plus archival documents. Dozens of historians, spanning age and perspective, provided on-air commentary in conjunction with distinguished researchers from a range of other fields like African American history, first nations scholarship and imperial studies.

Distinctive Filmmaking Approach

The documentary’s methodology will feel familiar to devotees of The Civil War. The characteristic technique featured methodical photographic exploration through archival photographs, generous use of period music with performers voicing historical documents.

Those projects established Burns established his reputation; a generation later, now the doyen of documentaries, he can apparently summon virtually any performer. Participating with Burns at a New York gathering, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”

All-Star Cast

The decade-long production schedule provided advantages concerning availability. Filming occurred in recording spaces, on location and remotely via Zoom, a tool embraced during the pandemic. Burns explains collaborating with actor Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to record his lines portraying the founding father then continuing to subsequent commitments.

Brolin is joined by Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, established Hollywood talent, emerging and established stars, multiple generations of actors, accomplished dramatic artists, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

The filmmaker continues: “Truly, this might be the most exceptional group ever assembled for any movie or television show. Their contributions are remarkable. Their celebrity status wasn’t the criteria. I became frustrated when someone asked, about the prominent cast. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They represent global acting excellence and they vitalize these narratives.”

Nuanced Narrative

Still, the absence of living witnesses, photography and newsreels forced Burns and his team to rely extensively on the written word, weaving together individual perspectives of multiple revolutionary participants. This approach enabled to introduce audiences beyond the prominent leaders of that era along with multiple essential to the narrative, numerous individuals never even had a portrait painted.

The filmmaker also explored his individual interest for maps and spatial representation. “I love maps,” he notes, “with greater cartographic content in this film than in all the other films I’ve done combined.”

International Impact

Filmmakers captured footage across multiple important places across North America and in London to capture the landscape’s character and partnered extensively with living history participants. These components unite to depict events more violent, complex and globally significant compared to standard education.

The film maintains, was no mere parochial quarrel about property, revenue and governance. Conversely, the project presents a blood-soaked struggle that ultimately drew in numerous countries and unexpectedly manifested what it calls “the noble aspirations of humankind”.

Civil War Reality

Early dissatisfaction and objections leveled at London by far-flung British subjects throughout multiple disputatious regions quickly evolved into a bloody domestic struggle, setting brother against brother and turning communities into battlegrounds. In one segment, scholar Alan Taylor notes: “The primary misunderstanding regarding the Revolutionary War centers on assuming it constituted a unifying experience for colonists. This ignores the truth that it was a civil war among Americans.”

Nuanced Understanding

In his view, the revolutionary narrative that “generally suffers from excessive romance and nostalgia and is incredibly superficial and insufficiently honors for what actually took place, and all the participants and the extensive brutality.

Taylor maintains, an uprising that declared the world-changing idea of the unalienable rights of people; a bloody domestic struggle, pitting Patriots against Loyalists; plus an international conflict, another installment in a sequence of struggles among European powers for the “prize of North America”.

Unpredictable Historical Moments

Burns additionally aimed {to rediscover the