🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."