🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and urging their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing many regions against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to terminate “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.