Britain's finance chief Grapples with A Most Significant Issue: The Brexit Conundrum
Rachel Reeves has tackled the imminent budget like a hesitant swimmer inching into freezing water, attempting to mitigate the unpleasantness through incremental entry.
Early Actions and Revenue Promises
The chancellor began addressing the problem of inadequate revenue at the close of summer. At first, she refused to stand by previous assertions that tax rises in the prior year's financial statement would be the final ones.
Later, recently, she took a larger stride into the icy sea. Her remarks committed to "take required actions" to support state services and keep loan interest under control.
Manifesto Promise and Political Withdrawal
Within 10 days, the Treasury had withdrawn the hint. The election promise still stood ultimately. Like every cold-water bather realizes, this aborted dive and trembling withdrawal is the worst of all approaches. No tactic prolongs the suffering like indecision.
It can be difficult to be resolute when selecting between levels of internally generated harm.
Expectation as Strategy
Optimism has not been a great strategy for the ruling party. At the core of the Labour leader's political platform was the unrealistic hope of somehow fulfilling citizens' demand for improved public services without undoing significant amounts of Tory tax cuts.
Messaging Weakness
Never has either the prime minister or the chancellor effectively expressed a impression of national purpose to explain all this pain. Partly that is a issue of leadership presence. The prime minister and the chancellor are uncannily comparable in their poor communication skills, awkward and reticent in a way that drives listeners back instead of attracting them in.
Brexit Deal and Financial Truth
In the same way that political pressure to support government services has pushed the exchequer to concede that revenue must go up, the financial necessity of increasing growth makes it increasingly difficult to ignore the expense of detachment from the continental trading bloc.
European Partnership and Negotiations
Ministers used a year dabbling in the shallow end of closer ties with the EU: plans to remove customs checks on food items; a student movement initiative. Vision went a more substantial on power generation, military and protection collaboration, but no significant agreements has so far been signed.
Political Context and International Standing
Without definite guidance and impetus from Downing Street, talks are stalled. Brussels authorities says single-market privileges are unlocked with contributions to the European funds. UK ministers understand that's the agreement. That doesn't make them eager for a open dispute and political opponents shouting disloyalty over any cost ends up being settled.
Financial Damage and Political Wording
Financial circumstances has provoked some change in the administration's rhetoric on the EU relationship. The chancellor has started identifying EU withdrawal alongside the health emergency as a factor of commercial injury that the exchequer is working hard to address. Other ministers have followed suit, although they cautiously attribute the fault to "poor negotiation terms" or "the way we left", never just "Brexit".
Geopolitical Context and Future Possibilities
The challenge of the UK's future relationship with the EU can't be limited to procedural changes and border mechanisms when the entire international system is in tumultuous flux. Given everything that has occurred since the referendum year, it feels reasonable still to be asking the big question: were Britain's interests served by leaving the EU?
Summary
These are cold, uncomfortable facts about the UK's position in choppy global circumstances. It is not surprising that both leaders recoil from the challenge. It would take them beyond their capabilities, into trends that they will not oppose. So rather they continue anxiously walking the coastline, hoping that perhaps shortly the tide will turn.